The following game (Sicilian Najdorf) was annotated by Fischer himself, so I did not add any comments to the actual score/notation. His comments are pretty high-level, one may find it necessary to use a board to see what he means when, for example, he gives advantage to Black or White a various points during the game.
Three main things stood out when going over the game and reading Fischer’s comments.

(1) The need to “book up” and stay current only Chess theory, that way you save yourself thinking time during the game, and also avoid reinventing the wheel.

(2) The need to understand the ideas behind a particular opening, for example, when on move 6, he mentions that “Black’s expectation in this Najdorf Variation is that his control of important central squares, with possibilities of Q-side expansion, will more than compensate for the slight weakness of his backward QP.”

(3) The need for imagination and calculating several moves ahead. When Fischer played 21…Rc8, I suspect that he saw that he could play 26…Rxc3.

I hope you enjoy the game. Your comments and thoughts are welcome.

Related posts:

1. Annotated Fischer 002: Fischer – Bolbochan In the following game, Fischer plays White against the Sicilian...
2. Annotated Miniature 1: Mayet – Anderssen, 1851 Studying miniatures has many benefits. First, almost always, the winner...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

There have been debates on what is more important, imagination or knowledge? Albert Einstein is quoted as having said, “imagination is more important that knowledge”. He could be right. He did not say, knowledge is not important. Knowledge is important, so is imagination. However, comparatively, in his opinion, imagination is more important.
I think imagination and knowledge (can) enrich each other. For example, if you want things to be different and you do not know (yet) of a way to make them different, you may go out and see knowledge or means to effect change. That is how necessity is the mother of invention. There is a need which awakens creativity in people. On the other hand, when you get a certain level of knowledge, you may wonder if there is a way to advance beyond what you have. Is there a better way? Are there some unanswered questions that can be answered by making a leap from current knowledge? It appears as if at the end of the day, imagination saves the day. However, it must be noted that in the latter case, knowledge provides the platform from which imagination is born and launched.
In Chess, accumulation of knowledge and experience saves time and effort during actual games. However, rarely does one play whole games that he or she has already prepared for at home. The opponent will surely detour from the script or you may depending on what is going on on the board. At that time you rely on your own resources. You try to use the knowledge and experiences that you have gained up to that point to win the game. In the process you create something on your own. The only limitation to what can happen on the board is your imagination. Sometimes the position may be barren such that there is no room for creativity. Most of the time, it is not, but one may just not know when the position is ripe for creativity. This brings up interesting questions. How does one know when to be creative? or How does one become creative? Well, I suggest that one cannot know when to be creative without being creative in the first place. These two questions will be addressed in later posts. For now, I will just say that a short answer to both questions is that you keep looking for opportunities to be creative. That continuous search will make you more creative, and as you are looking, you will find the perfect time to exercise your creativity.
As I study chess games, I will be looking for the moment in the game when a player or both players became creative and try to understand what preceded the creativity (on the board, of course) and what the effect of the creativity was, for example, winning, defending a difficult position, etc. In addition, as I play Chess, I will try to keep looking and searching for ways to play better moves – that is better individual moves, and better combinations of moves.
Please feel free to share your ideas, thoughts, suggestions, or questions on creativity or imagination in Chess. [I know that some people will say imagination and creativity are not one and the same. Right or wrong, we will use them interchangeably here.]

Related posts:

1. Annotated Fischer 001: Wolfgang Unzicker – Robert James Fischer The following game (Sicilian Najdorf) was annotated by Fischer himself,...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.