In the following game, Fischer plays White against the Sicilian Najdorf. This game was annotated by Fischer.
Four things stood out for me in this game:

1. Fischer knew the game was won by move 20, because he had a “Knight Outpost” on d5. It took another 17 moves to execute his win. As some people say, “winning from here is just a matter of technique”. Recognizing that you have a winning position, is a mark of a good player. Finding and executing a plan to turn the winning position into a win is a what separates the boys from the men.

2. Even Fischer has to make prophylactic (preventive or cautionary) moves… he has a comment when he makes the first such move on move 15. He says, “One never knows when lightning will strike!” A second such move is made on move 31. when he plays 31. a3. I was wondering whether that was prophylactic or a waiting move since Black appears to be in “zugzwang”.

3. I thought the position after Black played 30. ..Qh8 was interesting. The most powerful piece on the board is chased around until it finds solace in the corner! Lesson: watch where you place your pieces. If you play passively, you end up playing forced moves.

Black Queen is a sorry sight! Fischer - Bolbochan 1962 Stockholm Interzonal After 30...Qh8

4. Fischer did not fear exchanging pieces as he tried to convert the advantage into a win. A nice book on such a topic is “Exchanging to win in the end game” -

I hope you enjoy the game. You ideas and comments are welcome.

Related posts:

1. Annotated Fischer 001: Wolfgang Unzicker – Robert James Fischer The following game (Sicilian Najdorf) was annotated by Fischer himself,...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

There have been debates on what is more important, imagination or knowledge? Albert Einstein is quoted as having said, “imagination is more important that knowledge”. He could be right. He did not say, knowledge is not important. Knowledge is important, so is imagination. However, comparatively, in his opinion, imagination is more important.
I think imagination and knowledge (can) enrich each other. For example, if you want things to be different and you do not know (yet) of a way to make them different, you may go out and see knowledge or means to effect change. That is how necessity is the mother of invention. There is a need which awakens creativity in people. On the other hand, when you get a certain level of knowledge, you may wonder if there is a way to advance beyond what you have. Is there a better way? Are there some unanswered questions that can be answered by making a leap from current knowledge? It appears as if at the end of the day, imagination saves the day. However, it must be noted that in the latter case, knowledge provides the platform from which imagination is born and launched.
In Chess, accumulation of knowledge and experience saves time and effort during actual games. However, rarely does one play whole games that he or she has already prepared for at home. The opponent will surely detour from the script or you may depending on what is going on on the board. At that time you rely on your own resources. You try to use the knowledge and experiences that you have gained up to that point to win the game. In the process you create something on your own. The only limitation to what can happen on the board is your imagination. Sometimes the position may be barren such that there is no room for creativity. Most of the time, it is not, but one may just not know when the position is ripe for creativity. This brings up interesting questions. How does one know when to be creative? or How does one become creative? Well, I suggest that one cannot know when to be creative without being creative in the first place. These two questions will be addressed in later posts. For now, I will just say that a short answer to both questions is that you keep looking for opportunities to be creative. That continuous search will make you more creative, and as you are looking, you will find the perfect time to exercise your creativity.
As I study chess games, I will be looking for the moment in the game when a player or both players became creative and try to understand what preceded the creativity (on the board, of course) and what the effect of the creativity was, for example, winning, defending a difficult position, etc. In addition, as I play Chess, I will try to keep looking and searching for ways to play better moves – that is better individual moves, and better combinations of moves.
Please feel free to share your ideas, thoughts, suggestions, or questions on creativity or imagination in Chess. [I know that some people will say imagination and creativity are not one and the same. Right or wrong, we will use them interchangeably here.]

Related posts:

1. Annotated Fischer 001: Wolfgang Unzicker – Robert James Fischer The following game (Sicilian Najdorf) was annotated by Fischer himself,...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.